We use cookies.This website uses essential cookies to operate core features. With your consent, we also use analytics cookies to understand traffic and improve the service. For more details, see our .
We use cookies.This website uses essential cookies to operate core features. With your consent, we also use analytics cookies to understand traffic and improve the service. For more details, see our .
Was this tool helpful to use?
Your feedback helps us make it better
Bulk verify business entity authenticity and data consistency using company names, unified social credit codes, and legal representatives.
Input Format
One record per line, format: Unified Social Credit Code Legal Representative Name Enterprise Name
Supports space, comma, tab separators
• Supports up to 1000 records per batch
• Automatic Unified Social Credit Code validation after clicking 'Next'
• If deduplication is enabled, duplicate records will be removed automatically
Overview
Understand what the tool solves, how it works, and the boundaries of its data.
This batch checker compares a company’s Unified Social Credit Code, legal representative name, and registered company name with verification data returned for those inputs. It is intended for records about organizations in China. The English form and result labels help English-speaking teams review a list, while the underlying company identity fields are China-specific.
A Unified Social Credit Code is an identity code assigned to an organization by its registration authority. China’s State Administration for Market Regulation describes it as unique nationwide and unchanged for the organization’s lifetime; the current measure took effect February 1, 2026. The code helps identify which organization a record refers to, but a correctly formatted code alone does not show that the company name or representative matches.
Each valid row receives a verification status and details indicating whether the code, legal representative, and company name match. A passed result means the submitted fields matched the returned verification result for that check. A failed result directs you to the field-level details so you can find a likely mismatch. An unable-to-verify or error result means the check did not produce a usable match outcome.
This is a three-field consistency check. It does not assess creditworthiness, ownership, sanctions, litigation, operating condition, product quality, or supplier capability. It also does not verify a US business registration. Treat the result as one record-review signal for a China-related workflow.
Guide
Follow the workflow and verify inputs and outputs with practical examples.
For each China organization, prepare its Unified Social Credit Code, legal representative name, and company name. Use the registered name and representative spelling from the source record; keeping Chinese characters where available can reduce ambiguity introduced by transliteration.
Paste one record per line in the order code, representative name, company name, separated by spaces, commas, or tabs. Or upload a CSV, TXT, XLS, or XLSX file with those same three columns. The upload limit is 1 MB. A downloadable CSV example shows the expected column order.
Check that columns have not shifted and remove unrelated rows. Blank rows can be removed and duplicate records can be deduplicated using the available options. The code is checked for the expected 18-character structure and check digit before submission. Plan for 20 to 1,000 valid records in a batch; preview the billable count and displayed charge before starting.
Start verification after reviewing the list and charge. When processing finishes, compare each status and its three field details with your source documents. Export the results workbook if you need to route exceptions for follow-up.
If a row fails, compare each displayed field detail with the original license or registration record. Check that the code, representative, and company name came from the same entity and row; then check for a transcription error, a translated or former company name, or an outdated representative entry. Correct the source list and recheck only after you can support the revised values. Keep the result alongside the date and source of the record you used for internal review.
Use cases
See how the tool fits into real work and everyday tasks.
A sourcing or procurement team can batch-check identity fields collected from China suppliers before moving exceptions to a manual document review. A mismatch helps identify which row needs follow-up; it does not establish factory capability or product compliance.
An operations team maintaining China partner records can compare name, code, and representative fields in one run, then export results so data stewards can correct supported discrepancies in the source system.
For a consequential onboarding or payment decision, use the result to identify what to verify next. Compare the organization against current documents supplied by the counterparty and, where appropriate, check public registration details through the official Chinese enterprise information system. Record which entity you checked and when, especially if names are presented in both Chinese and English.
Q&A
Find concise answers to common questions and confusing cases.
No. The local format check checks the code structure and check digit. The verification result separately reports whether the code, representative name, and company name match the returned record.
First confirm all three values belong to the same organization and that the name was not translated, abbreviated, mistyped, or taken from an old document. If the source is correct, compare it with current registration information and investigate the discrepancy before updating your records.
No. The inputs identify China organizations through a Unified Social Credit Code and related China registration fields. This is not a US business registry lookup or a general company verification service.
Notes
Review scope, result limitations, and important precautions before use.
A match is not a registration certificate, credit rating, legal conclusion, or full supplier due diligence report.
Returned information can be incomplete, unavailable, or different from documents you hold. A failed or unavailable check does not by itself prove fraud or misconduct. For material business decisions, verify the entity and current registration details through appropriate official records and original documents, and assess other relevant risks separately.
The three submitted identity fields are sent for verification. Submit only records you are authorized to process and limit the batch to information needed for this check. This paid function displays an estimated charge before a run; review that amount and the eligible record count in the preview before submitting.
Related
Discover related tools, collections, and available API capabilities.