We use cookies.This website uses essential cookies to operate core features. With your consent, we also use analytics cookies to understand traffic and improve the service. For more details, see our .
TIGER Hash Calculator
Was this tool helpful to use?
Your feedback helps us make it better
Calculate TIGER-128, TIGER-160, and TIGER-192 hashes online. Supports multiple input formats and salting for data validation and digest generation.
Overview
Understand what the tool solves, how it works, and the boundaries of its data.
A hash function maps input text to a fixed-length digest. This Tiger page calculates a digest from typed text and lets you choose one of six labels: Tiger128,3; Tiger160,3; Tiger192,3; Tiger128,4; Tiger160,4; or Tiger192,4. The first number names the output length in bits; the final number selects the configured round variant. The original Tiger design describes a three-pass core and a 192-bit result. Shorter output lengths and the four-round options are distinct compatibility selections supported by this tool.
A digest is not encrypted text and cannot be decoded back into the input. It is useful when two parties already agree on the algorithm and exact input representation, for example while reproducing a legacy value. The result is shown in lowercase and uppercase hexadecimal, plus a Base64-form output. Confirm the receiving system’s expected encoding before comparing the Base64 field.
Text must match byte for byte for a comparison to be meaningful. Spaces, line endings, Unicode representation, and capitalization are part of the input. A visually identical string can therefore produce a different digest if its encoded bytes differ.
Guide
Follow the workflow and verify inputs and outputs with practical examples.
Ask whether the expected value is Tiger128, Tiger160, or Tiger192 and whether it uses 3 or 4 rounds. “Tiger” alone may be ambiguous.
Paste only the characters being hashed. Check for leading or trailing spaces, newline characters, and the agreed text encoding.
Select the same variant, generate the digest, and compare like-for-like output encodings. Hexadecimal letter case can be normalized before comparison.
If two outputs differ, first verify the variant and input bytes. Do not assume a digest mismatch means the source file or account was tampered with until the complete comparison process is checked.
Use cases
See how the tool fits into real work and everyday tasks.
When a legacy system specifies a Tiger variant, recompute the digest for the same text and compare it with the stored expected value.
Two developers can independently calculate a value after agreeing on the variant and exact text bytes, then use the digest as a quick difference check.
Use the same sample with different bit lengths and round selections to see why a protocol or archive must specify the complete Tiger variant.
Q&A
Find concise answers to common questions and confusing cases.
No. Tiger is a one-way hash function. There is no decryption operation that restores the original text from the digest.
No. They have different output lengths. Choose exactly the variant expected by the record or protocol you are checking.
The available selections are labeled Tiger with a bit length and round count. Tiger2 is a distinct padding variant and is not one of the choices shown here.
This page’s text mode hashes typed text. Do not use this legacy unkeyed hash as a password-storage method or as a modern security design.
Notes
Review scope, result limitations, and important precautions before use.
Tiger output is appropriate here for compatibility, comparison, or learning. Do not choose it for new password storage, authentication, or a security protocol without a current expert review and an algorithm specified for that purpose.
Related
Discover related tools, collections, and available API capabilities.